Legal Opinion
Watson v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1925No. Civil No. 2348PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
M. B. Watson, S. J. Jennings, and W. L. Trout, copartners as Pima Ginning Company, hereinafter called plaintiffs, were engaged in the cotton ginning business in Maricopa county during 1921 and 1922. At the time E. J. Bennitt & Company were local agents for a number of insurance com pardes, among them the Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, Limited, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, with power to place policies, collect the premiums and remit them, but not to issue or cancel policies. Frank Mosshammer was manager of the insurance department of Bennitt & Company, and conducted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Deatsch v. FairfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Colorado Leasing, Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- South Knoxville Brick Co. v. Empire State Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Federal Insurance Company v. PAT Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CassinelliNevada Supreme Court · 1950
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Audra H. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Maryland Casualty Company v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.