Legal Opinion

Charvoz v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1951No. 7442PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Davis County District Court entered on a no cause of action verdict. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial, each party to bear its own costs on appeal.

Plaintiff cites as error the giving and failure to give instructions hereinafter discussed.

Defendant has operated and maintained a cement canal, reinforced by earthen banks, since 1921. Water is pumped into the canal from a river below. A storm of unusual severity occured in 1947. A segment of the canal passing over a gulley, which latter was drained by a 3 foot…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Heckaman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Bader v. Mills & Baker Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Caperon v. TuttleUtah Supreme Court · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. First Sec. Bank of Utah, N.A. United States v. Allen. United States v. Cota (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  2. Schaefer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Garden City Company, a Corporation, and United States Irrigating Company, a Corporation v. Charles BentrupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Dougherty v. California-Pacific Utilities CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Nestman v. South Davis County Water Improvement DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API