Legal Opinion

Nestman v. South Davis County Water Improvement District

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1965No. 10121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiffs sue the South Davis County Water Improvement District for damages caused to their home and its contents by flooding when the defendants’ reservoir gave way. Upon stipulated facts the district court rendered judgment against the defendant District in the amount of $5,-675.00.

The sole issue presented for determination on this appeal is whether the defendant Water District is protected from liability on the ground of sovereign immunity.

The defendant was created as a water improvement district in 1955 pursuant to Chapter 6 of Title 17, U.C.A.1953. Between that date…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Burton v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Egelhoff v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Gordon v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Utah State University of Agriculture & Applied Science v. Sutro & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. MacArthur v. San Juan CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005
  4. Johnson v. Salt Lake County Cottonwood Sanitary DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API