Schaefer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
The Workers Compensation Bureau [Bureau] appeals from a district court judgment reversing the Bureau’s determination that Kenneth Bedor was an “employee” of Ted Schaefer, doing business as Fresh Air Enterprises [Schaefer], within the meaning of the Workers Compensation Act. We reverse the judgment of the district court and reinstate the Bureau’s decision.
Schaefer was the Bismarck area distributor of the “Rainbow Household Cleaning System” [Rainbow], a multi-purpose machine that operates as a vacuum cleaner, air freshener, and humidifier. In March 1988 Bedor agreed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc. v. North Dakota State Board of PharmacyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Fleck v. Jacques Seed Co., Prescott, WisconsinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Claim of BromleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Inglis v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Wills v. Schroeder Aviation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Public Service Commission v. Wimbledon Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Little v. TracyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. StetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Effertz v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Pleinis v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.