Hyde v. St. Clair
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County denying and dismissing a petition for partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person. Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
M. Young died, leaving a last will, which was admitted to probate in the superior court of Santa Cruz County, and letters testamentary thereon were issued to A. St. Clair and William Armstrong on the 27th of April, 1903.. On December 12, 1904, Pauline Young Hyde, one of the appellants, filed a petition for partial distribution, in which she alleged that the decedent had left as his sole heirs four children, of whom she was one, and that said decedent had, by an omission not appearing to be intentional, failed to provide in his will for any of his said children. The executors met this petition…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Elliott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marshall & Stearns Co. v. Deneen Bldg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1915