Legal Opinion
Plank v. Devereux Foundation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 2, 2015No. Civil Action No. 13-7337PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Mary Plank’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Mary Plank was hired by The Devereux Foundation (“Devereux”) on February 1, 1993. (Administrative Record (“A.R.”) 502-03, 656.) At the time of Plaintiffs disability onset, she was the Director of Food Services for Devereux. (Id.) According to Plaintiffs description of her job, she worked approximately fifty to sixty hours per week cooking approximately 700…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reichard v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Van Arsdel v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of BostonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Malam v. Rebecca AdducciDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020