Legal Opinion

Reichard v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-2885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

*441The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 - 1461, provides protections for employees participating in their employer's benefits plans. Based upon her diagnoses of Crohn's disease and related gastrointestinal and arthritic conditions, the plaintiff employee received both short-term disability and long-term disability benefits under her employer's respective plans. The claims administrator later terminated her long-term disability benefits after the disability definition under the plan changed from merely requiring an inability to perform her own regular…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES LLC v. ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  2. ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES, LLC v. CENTENE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. DOE v. BRENNANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Giovanna Reichard v. United Omaha Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. HUBAY v. MENDEZDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API