Legal Opinion

Bullard v. Universal Millwork Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 17, 1960No. Civ. No. 20086PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTELS, District Judge.

Defendant moves under Rules 31(d) and 30(b) of the Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 *344U.S.C.A., to vacate plaintiff’s demand for the answers to 118 interrogatories and, alternatively, to (i) ’ extend defendant’s time to answer until after plaintiff has produced certain documents demanded in connection with plaintiff’s depositions, (ii) strike 32 of the said interrogatories, and (iii) extend defendant’s time to answer the interrogatories to ten days after the service of an order entered on its application. Plaintiff, withdrawing those interrogatories demanding production of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  3. Kaiser-Frazer Corp. v. Otis & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  4. Vilastor Kent Theatre Corp. v. BrandtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. Guilford National Bank v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberson v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
  2. Carpenter v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  3. B-H Transportation Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1968
  4. Hesselbine v. von WedelDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API