Legal Opinion
Vilastor Kent Theatre Corp. v. Brandt
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 7, 1955PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiffs for production of documents under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The action is one to recover treble damages for alleged violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2. The complaint alleges that the defendants conspired to deprive the plaintiffs’ theatres of runs and clearances to which they were entitled.
In order for plaintiffs to recover for defendants’ denial of runs and clearances to them, plaintiffs must show that they requested defendants to grant them such runs and clearances. See J. J. Theatres,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Civil Service Employees Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- J. J. Theatres, Inc. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
3Cited by14 opinions
- Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Congress Building Corporation v. Loew's, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Erone Corp. v. Skouras Theatres Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Saunders v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.