Legal Opinion

Nisbet v. Van Tuyl

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 10, 1955No. 11315PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought to recover damages occasioned by the alleged negligence of the defendants in failing to properly plug an abandoned oil well. The district court sustained defendants' motion for a summary judgment and entered a judgment for costs against plaintiffs, from which this appeal is taken. The errors relied on arise out of the granting of defendants’ said motion.

The facts before the court, for the purpose of the motion for summary judgment, are those appearing in plaintiffs’ amended complaint, defendants’ answer thereto and the affidavit of Ira Van…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Middlesboro Home Telephone Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Murphy v. HomansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Sullivan v. ColbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  4. Palmer Corporation v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. 188 LLC v. Trinity Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. The Wellness Community Tm-National v. Wellness House F/k/a the Wellness Community Tm Chicago/western SuburbsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Eugene M. Fuhrer v. Malcolm W. FuhrerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API