Middlesboro Home Telephone Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Commissioner Candid ge
Affirming’ in part and reversing in part.
For convenience the appellants, Middlesboro Home Telephone Company and Tri-State Telephone Company, will be referred to as the “telephone company,” and the appellee, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, will be referred to as the “railroad company.” The railroad company operates a line of railroad through the city of Middlesboro, Kentucky, its tracks crossing Longwood road, one of the streets of that municipality. The telephone company has a line of telephone extending along that street, and where it…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- City of Brooklyn v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Nucor Corp. v. General Electric Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Brown Hotel Co. v. Pittsburgh Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. Southern Pacific Co. v. Booth-Kelly Lumber CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Arthur Dixon Transfer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951
- DeStock 14, Inc. v. LogsdonKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.