Legal Opinion

Fast v. Fast

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1972No. 46,219PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Foth, C.:

This is a dispute over an undivided one-twelfth (Viz) interest in the oil, gas and other minerals underlying a half-section of land in Reno County. Appellees, plaintiffs below, were granted summary judgment quieting their title to a collective five/eighths (%) interest in the undivided one-twelfth (142) as against the defendants, who have appealed.

The basic issue is whether a deed conveying real estate by surface description, with no qualifying, reserving or excepting language, conveys the grantor’s interest in the underlying minerals when…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fry v. DeweesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Lanyon Zinc Co. v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Richards v. ShearerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Place v. PlaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. Barker v. LashbrookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hall v. MullenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Cosgrove v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Donald J. Wylie v. The Marley CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Dressel v. WeeksAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API