Legal Opinion

Cosgrove v. Young

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 27, 1981No. 53,311PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*706The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

Plaintiffs Thomas F. Cosgrove and Mary C. Van Slyck brought this action against defendants Louise B. Young, Donald P. Young, Jr., and Frederic R. Young: (1) To declare that a certain instrument conveying a royalty interest in gas and oil production was void for violation of the rule against perpetuities; and (2) to quiet plaintiffs’ title to said property. On stipulated facts, the trial court held the instrument was a nullity but permitted defendants to continue to receive royalties from one 1950 unitized off-premises gas well. There were…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Burden v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Bellport v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Klingman v. GilbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Stith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Fry v. DeweesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Iola State Bank v. BiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Hall v. MullenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Arrowhead Construction Co. v. Essex Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Insurance Company of North America v. The Medical Protective CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. WoolmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API