Cosgrove v. Young
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*706The opinion of the court was delivered by
McFarland, J.:
Plaintiffs Thomas F. Cosgrove and Mary C. Van Slyck brought this action against defendants Louise B. Young, Donald P. Young, Jr., and Frederic R. Young: (1) To declare that a certain instrument conveying a royalty interest in gas and oil production was void for violation of the rule against perpetuities; and (2) to quiet plaintiffs’ title to said property. On stipulated facts, the trial court held the instrument was a nullity but permitted defendants to continue to receive royalties from one 1950 unitized off-premises gas well. There were…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Burden v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Bellport v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Klingman v. GilbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Stith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Fry v. DeweesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Iola State Bank v. BiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Hall v. MullenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Arrowhead Construction Co. v. Essex Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Insurance Company of North America v. The Medical Protective CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. WoolmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.