Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports

Decided May 13, 1994No. 93-1005Published

1Opinion of the Court

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General ______________________________________ OPINION : : No. 93-1005 of : : May 13, 1994 DANIEL E. LUNGREN : Attorney General : : CLAYTON P. ROCHE : Deputy Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________________ THE HONORABLE MICHAEL D. BRADBURY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Ventura County, has requested an opinion on the following question: May the card game 21 be played in California under conditions where each player is charged a fixed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. SettlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Gayer v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. People v. LungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Merandette v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API