Legal Opinion

State v. Bunning

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 9, 1994No. 403A92PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant’s first assignment of error deals with the charge. The court charged the jury on reasonable doubt as follows:

Now, a reasonable doubt is not a vain, imaginary or fanciful doubt, but it’s a sane and rational doubt. It’s a doubt based on common sense. When it’s said that you, the jury, must be satisfied of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, it is meant that you must be fully satisfied or completely satisfied or satisfied to a moral certainty of the truth of the charge. If, after considering, comparing and weighing the evidence or lack of evidence, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. FlowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. HueySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API