Legal Opinion

Penmac Corp. v. Esterbrook Steel Pen Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 8, 1940No. 140PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

This action for the usual injunction and accounting for patent infringement was originally brought upon nine patents .for mechanical pencils. Four were eliminated voluntarily from the action before trial. The District Court sustained the claims as to two and held the other three invalid. Defendant’s appeal therefore concerns only the two patents upheld, Nos. 1,866,072 and 1,928,042, issued to Alfred Woelm (Woelm No. 1 and No. 2). The detailed claims as to each — Claims Nos. 1, 2, 24-26, 28-30, 36, and 37 of No. 1, and 6, 7, 10, 12, and 13 as to No. 2 — are quoted in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Railroad Supply Co. v. Elyria Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alex Lee Wallau, Inc. v. J. W. Landenberger & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Falkenberg v. GoldingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  3. W. F. & John Barnes Co. v. International Harvester Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1943
  4. In re Imperial Irr. DistDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
  5. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API