Legal Opinion

Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 29, 1935No. Nos. 588, 653PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

This cause presents issues as to validity and infringement of claim 23 of the Stephens reissue patent, No. 16,360, for “an improvement in needles and its method of use.” The Stelos Company, owner of the patent, sued Hosiery Motor-Mend Corporation and others for infringement. The District Court adjudged the claim invalid by reason of failure to make proper disclosure of the alleged invention, and anticipation; and also thought that if the claim were sustained the defendants did not infringe, and dismissed the bill. The Circuit Court of Appeals held the prior art required so narrow a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Century Distilling Co. v. Continental Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. The Maytag Company, a Corporation v. The Murray Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  4. Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Visking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  5. Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. HumphrysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API