Legal Opinion

United States v. Aluminum Co. of America

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 17, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

The motion of the Government asks for two things. These are described in its brief (p. 3) as follows: “(1) an order designating the [oral] opinion delivered from September 30, 1941 to October 9, 1941 as findings of fact and conclusions of law in conformity with Rule 52 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and (2) the entry of a final order [dismissing the petition] from which the Government may appeal, such order to be entered whether or not the relief sought in (1), supra, be granted.” All defendants oppose the motion.

The views of…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bartels v. Sperti, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  2. EW Bliss Company v. Cold Metal Process CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
  3. (PC) Garrett v. BakerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API