Legal Opinion

W. F. & John Barnes Co. v. International Harvester Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 17, 1943No. Civil Action 2907PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, District Judge.

This consolidated cause came on for hearing on two amended complaints, both filed on February 16, 1942, one by W. F. . & John Barnes Company and Odin Corporation against International Harvester Company and Ex-Cell-O Corporation, and the other by John S. Barnes Corporation and Odin Corporation against the same defendants, and on an amended answer thereto, filed June 19, 1942, and two amendments to said amended answer filed, respectively, on July 2, 1942, and August 29, 1942.

The amended complaints charge infringement of eleven United States patents on certain machine…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ellipse Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Ford Motor Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. W. F. & John Barnes Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  3. Permo, Inc. v. Hudson-Ross, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  4. Texas Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953
  5. Myerson v. Dentists' Supply Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API