Legal Opinion

Randleman v. Fidelity National Title Insurance

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 25, 2008No. 3:06CV7049PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

On June 18, 2008, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company [Fidelity] wrote a letter informing me of a discovery dispute concerning plaintiffs’ request for production of documents. The parties, failing to resolve the issue on their own, have requested my intervention. Each party has submitted statements of their discovery positions, which I have reviewed.

For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’ request for production of documents shall be denied.

Background

Plaintiffs have asked Fidelity to produce all drafts of the agent, broker and lender affidavits submitted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. In Re Antitrust Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. In Re GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Institute for the Development of Earth Awareness v. People for the Ethical Treatment of AnimalsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Brantley v. Ferrell Electric, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2015
  3. Boyer v. GildeaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
  4. Clemmons v. Academy for Educational Development, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Schoenmann ex rel. Estate of UCBH Holdings, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API