Legal Opinion

Gilligan v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 30, 1941No. 28683PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “One essential element in the offense of cheating and swindling by false representations is that the representations must relate to an existing fact or past event. A representation, even though false and fraudulent, relating to the future can not be the basis of a prosecution for cheating and swindling. Ryan v. State, 45 Ga. 128; Miller v. State, 99 Ga. 207 (25 S. E. 169); Dickerson v. State, 113 Ga. 1035 (39 S. E. 426); Edge v. State, 114 Ga. 113 (39 S. E. 889); Goddard v. State, 2 Ga. App. 154 (58 S. E. 304); Meacham v. State, 7 Ga. App. 713 (2) (68 S. E. 52).” Vaughan v. State, 36 Ga.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goddard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  3. Meacham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Edge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Vaughan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Elliott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Croy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Lindsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API