Lindsey v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
“ ‘One essential element in the offense of cheating and swindling by false representations is that the representations must relate to an existing fact or past event. A representation, even though false and fraudulent, relating to the future can not be the basis of a prosecution for cheating and swindling. Ryan v. State, 45 Ga. 128; Miller v. State, 99 Ga. 207 (25 SE 169); Dickerson v. State, 113 Ga. 1035 (39 SE 426); Edge v. State, 114 Ga. 113 (39 SE 889); Goddard v. State, 2 Ga. App. 154 (58 SE 304); Meacham v. State, 7 Ga. App. 713 (2) (68 SE 52). Vaughan v. State, 36 Ga.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goddard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Meacham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Edge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Vaughan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Croy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974