Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1962No. 39820PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

“ ‘One essential element in the offense of cheating and swindling by false representations is that the representations must relate to an existing fact or past event. A representation, even though false and fraudulent, relating to the future can not be the basis of a prosecution for cheating and swindling. Ryan v. State, 45 Ga. 128; Miller v. State, 99 Ga. 207 (25 SE 169); Dickerson v. State, 113 Ga. 1035 (39 SE 426); Edge v. State, 114 Ga. 113 (39 SE 889); Goddard v. State, 2 Ga. App. 154 (58 SE 304); Meacham v. State, 7 Ga. App. 713 (2) (68 SE 52). Vaughan v. State, 36 Ga.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goddard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  3. Meacham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Edge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Vaughan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Croy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API