Legal Opinion

Meacham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1910No. 2389PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. December 5, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtKussell, J.

1. Upon the call of this case a motion was made to dismiss the writ of error, upon the ground that the evidence in the record was not briefed as required by law. The only statement of the evidence is embodied in what purports to be a copy of the petition for certiorari which was presented to the judge of the superior court, and which he declined to sanction. The petition for certiorari is property incorporated in the bill of exceptions. As the issuance of the writ of certiorari was denied, the petition for certiorari should appear before this court in the exact form in which it was presented…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Garner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. DoverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Neidlinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Stephens v. MilikinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Croy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Macon Union Co-Operative Ass'n v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Vaughan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API