Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1927No. 17972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. One essential element in the offense of cheating and swindling by false representations is that the representations must relate to an existing fact or past event. A representation, even though false and fraudulent, relating to the future can not be the basis of a prosecution for cheating and swindling. Ryan v. State, 45 Ga. 128; Miller v. State, 99 Ga. 207 (25 S. E. 169); Dickerson v. State, 113 Ga. 1035 (39 S. E. 426); Edge v. State, 114 Ga. 113 (39 S. E. 889); Goddard v. State, 2 Ga. App. 154 (58 S. E. 304); Meacham v. State, 7 Ga. App. 713 (2) (68 S. E. 52).

2. The accused contracted to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goddard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  3. Meacham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Edge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Dickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  2. Elliott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Croy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Gilligan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Lindsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API