Legal Opinion

Jensen v. McCullough

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1928No. Docket No. 6427PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to require the respondent to pay to the state treasurer moneys claimed to be due the state by reason of commitments from the county of San Benito to the Sonoma State Home. The petitioner is the director of the department of institutions of the state and the respondent is the treasurer of San Benito County. The controversy arises over the claim of the respondent that the act of the legislature (secs. 2192 and 2193, Pol. Code), which places this charge upon the county from which the commitments are made, is unconstitutional. The respondent has appeared…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Meyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Selowsky v. Superior Court of Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. City of Tulare v. HevrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fitts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Board of Supervisors v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Association of Classroom Teachers of Oklahoma City, Inc. v. Independent School District 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API