Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1975No. 86435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

Plaintiff-landowners petitioned the circuit court for a writ of review of a final order of defendant Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission approving annexation of their land to the city of Estacada. The circuit court set aside the annexation order. Defendants appeal.

This case calls upon us to determine the extent of the power of a local government boundary commission to modify an annexation proposal submitted pursuant to the so-called “triple majority” provisions of OES 222.170.

OES 222.111 authorizes a city to annex contiguous territory by the extension of its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Board of Directors v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Horner's Market v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. McLain v. LaffertyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Central Pacific Railway Co. v. AgerOregon Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Sanitary Service, Inc. v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Bresnan v. BresnanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Brooks v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API