Legal Opinion

Bresnan v. Bresnan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 1979No. 344-450, CA 12500PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

The Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) seeks reversal of the order of the circuit court requiring that PERS withhold $140 per month from the retirement benefits payable to defendant George Bresnan and pay it over to plaintiff to apply on delinquent support payments.

The sole issue as framed by the parties is whether ORS 237.201 1 and 23.170 2 exempt pension funds from legal process for the collection of delinquent support payments pursuant to ORS 23.777. 3 We hold that the exemption applies, and therefore reverse.

The facts are not in dispute. Defendant Bresnan is entitled to a monthly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Mahone v. MahoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Shelley v. ShelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Calvin v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. McLain v. LaffertyOregon Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Eskine v. EskineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Satterfield v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API