Legal Opinion

Szczerkowski v. Karmelowicz

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 17, 2000No. AC 18801PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The defendant, Linda Karmelowicz, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting motions by the plaintiff, Thaddeus Szczerkowski, to modify certain visitation and support orders thus increasing the plaintiffs visitation with the parties’ two minor children and applying his child support payments during summer visitation with them to his arrearages, and denying the defendant’s motions for reconsideration and for the appointment of counsel for the children. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court abused its discretion in (1) failing to find a substantial change…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. State v. JarzbekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Opotzner v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Greene v. PerryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Janik v. JanikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. In re Sheena I.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Gina M. G. v. William C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API