Legal Opinion
State v. Hagar
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 24, 2005No. 52809-2-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
105 P.3d 65 (2005)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Howard H. HAGAR, Appellant.
No. 52809-2-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
January 24, 2005.
Susan F. Wilk, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Scott Allen Peterson, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
PUBLISHED IN PART
COX, C.J.
Howard Hagar challenges the exceptional sentences imposed following his guilty plea to three counts of first degree theft, arguing that the sentences must be reversed in light of Blakely v. Washington.[1] Although Hagar stipulated to facts in his plea agreement that support the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SuleimanWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HagarWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HagarWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- In Re BeitoWashington Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.