Legal Opinion
State v. Hagar
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 12, 2006No. 77138-3PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
144 P.3d 298 (2006)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Howard HAGAR, Petitioner.
No. 77138-3.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued November 15, 2005.
Decided October 12, 2006.
Susan F. Wilk, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Scott Allen Peterson, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
C. JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1 This court is asked to determine if a defendant who pleads guilty pursuant to a plea bargain and who stipulates to "real facts" for sentencing purposes may successfully pursue a Blakely[1] challenge. The Court of Appeals affirmed Howard Hagar's conviction holding he did not make a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. FloresWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. FloresWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. SaltzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. SaltzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. LarkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.