Legal Opinion

United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto Sanchez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 17, 2001No. 00-13347, 00-13447PublishedCited by 178 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-Appellants Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez and Santiago Gilberto Sanchez (“the Sanchezes”) appeal their convictions and sentences after pleading guilty to a single-count indictment that charged them with conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and amphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. They challenge their convictions and sentences primarily based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). A panel of this Court affirmed. See United States v. Sanchez, 242 F.3d 1294 (11th…

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by178 opinions

  1. United States v. Ramse ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Pedro Luis Christopher TinocoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. NovationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Juan PazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API