Commonwealth v. Forbes
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
GANTMAN, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, Earl Forbes, appeals from his judgment of sentence and asks us to determine whether the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and whether the court erred in charging the jury on the elements of burglary. Appellant also asks us to determine whether the court erred in applying Pennsylvania’s “two-strikes” sentencing statute. Specifically, Appellant claims 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9714(a)(1) offends due process under the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions. We hold the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence and Appellant’s challenge to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commonwealth v. WidmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MourySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. HankersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. CoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. StilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.