Legal Opinion

Berrier v. Rountree

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 27, 2018No. 1 CA-CV 18-0081 FCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANN, Judge:

*9¶ 1 In this family-law case, the superior court was asked to establish a primary residence for a child who had previously shared time equally with parents in two different states on a biweekly basis. The parties presented the issue as one of parenting-time reconfiguration and school choice, and the court adopted that view. We hold that the issue was actually one of relocation affecting parenting time. We remand so that the parties may file appropriate pleadings to permit the court to make all required findings regarding the relocation question under A.R.S. § 25-408, and so that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buencamino v. NoftsingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Nicaise v. SundaramCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. Paul E. v. Courtney F.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. Sundstrom v. FlattCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coffee v. Ryan-TouhillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  2. Whitman v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API