Matthews v. Archie

This appeal presents a controversy, rising from a written contract for the sale of an automobile by Matthews, to Archie. The declaration alleges that .after Archie had paid $242 on the purchase price of the automobile, Archie rescinded the contract and repossessed the automobile.- The declaration further alleges that the written contract was a contract of conditional sale, that after repossession, Matthews has failed to comply with the statute, Code Section 7286 et seq., defining the duties of the conditional vendor after repossession, and that, therefore, Plaintiff Archie sues to recover the…