Legal Opinion

Star Clothing Manufacturing Co. v. Nordeman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 17 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Dai Mson County. ■ — John Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The S. Steinberg Dry Goods Company ordered from the complainant a bill of goods amounting to $113. This order was filled, but as a condition thereof the complainant required the execution of the following obligation:

“It is agreed between the parties to this order that this bill becomes immediately due and payable if person or persons to whom goods were consigned assigns, burps out, sells out, is sued, suspends payment, removes, incumbers, or otherwise disposes of his or their stock of merchandise; and the seller, if he so elects, may claim any or all of the portion of the goods herein…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Carron v. AbounadorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Robinson Bros. Motor Co. v. KnightTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Kenner & Co. v. PetersTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Coweta Fertilizer Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  5. Matthews v. ArchieTennessee Supreme Court · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API