Legal Opinion

Commerce Union Bank v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 24, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

These causes were consolidated in the chancery court.

These two suits were instituted by the banks, assignees, against the defendant, Jackson, who was an indorser of title retention notes. The chancellor rendered a decree against Jackson for $5,812.57 in favor of the Commerce Union Bank and for $1,330.09 in favor of 'the Union Trust & Mortgage Company. Jackson appealed to this court and has assigned errors which raise the proposition that the holders of the notes, the banks, failed to advertise and sell the automobiles in accordance with the Conditional Sales Act, Shannon's Code, section 3666…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Ice & Coal Co. v. AlleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Mercantile Bank of Memphis v. BusbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Whitelaw Furniture Co. v. BoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Range Motor Co. v. TiptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Roskind v. EltermanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Joyner v. GraybealSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  2. CIT Corporation v. HaynesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  3. Matthews v. ArchieTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  4. AmSouth Bank v. Trailer Source, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Beets v. John R. Jarnagin Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API