Legal Opinion

Looney v. Stryker

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1926No. 2944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

BICKLEY, J.

This is an action instituted by the appellant against the appellees in the district court of Santa Fe county, wherein, appellant sought to have th e state officials named as defendants restrained from paying out- certain moneys, alleged to be due to the defendant Stryker, until the appellant could obtain judgment against the said defendant Stryker. In response to the rule show cause issued therein, the state officials filed a demurrer wherein they attacked the sufficiency of the complaint to constitute a cause of action against the demurring defendants. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. State v. Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Cornwall v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886
  5. Bank of Monroe v. Ouachita Valley BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. VidalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Campbell Building Co. v. State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In Re GibsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Arnold v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API