Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Dodge
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
E. L. and E. W. Lahar, partners doing business under the firm name of Lahar Brothers, brought this suit in the Pulaski Chancery Court against the chairman and members of the Arkansas State Highway Commission, and for their cause of action allowed the following facts:
That they had entered into a written contract with the State Highway Commission to construct certain portions of the State highway system, pursuant to which they had earned a large sum of money, which was payable to them under their contract, but the commission had refused to make proper estimates of the work and had declined to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Smith v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pittsburgh Elevator Co. v. West Virginia Board of RegentsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Stewart v. State Road Commission of West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
- Dougherty v. VidalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Nelson Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Campbell v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.