Dougherty v. Vidal
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, Chief Justice.
This suit is against S. P. Vidal and two others, county commissioners of McKinley county, and Frank Butt and four others, constituting the state highway commission. The complaint sets up that, at the instance and request of the highway commission, plaintiff granted to the county an easement for road purposes; to which he was induced by, and the only consideration for which was, a promise of defendants not to change the grade of the then road; and that defendants proceeded to construct a new road on a grade four feet higher than the old, to plaintiff’s damage $7,500.
Plaint…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Langford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. LockeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Hicks v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Sangre De Cristo Development Corp. v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Lowrance v. PattonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Nelson Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Maffei v. Incoporated Town of KemmererWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.