Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Townley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 27, 1954No. 34265PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error was the defendant in the trial court and defendant in error' was plaintiff and hereafter they will be referred to as they there appeared.

The plaintiff commenced this replevin action in the district court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, wherein he sought to replevy certain described livestock and to recover judgment on two notes, one for $2,400, bearing 6'% interest from the 6th day of June, 1947, and ten percent attorneys’ fees, and one for $3,950, bearing 6% interest from September 12, 1947, and ten percent attorneys’ fees.

A Writ of Replevin describing certain cattle was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Linderman v. NolanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. First State Bank of Addington v. LatimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Rogers County Bank v. CullisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Howell v. BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Mitchell v. DadasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Burke v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Hanna v. ParrishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Gutowsky v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Scovil v. ChilcoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Allied Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API