Legal Opinion

Modern Exploration, Inc. v. Maddison

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 24, 1986No. 13-85-092-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

Modern Exploration, Inc. and Modern Drilling, Inc., (“Modern”) appeal the ruling below terminating part of their oil and gas lease from Paul and Melba Maddison. Modern raises issues involving the sufficiency of the evidence, the construction of the lease, the submission of special issues on damages, and the admissibility of testimony about attorney’s fees from an expert witness not listed in response to a discovery question. We reverse and render the judgment in part, modify it in part, and as modified, affirm the remaining portion of the trial court judgment.

Paul…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Dyson v. Olin Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Allied Finance Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Ellis v. WaldropTexas Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Southwest Guaranty Trust Co. v. Hardy Road 13.4 Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  2. Terrill v. Tuckness, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Taub v. Houston Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  4. City of Brownsville v. Pena, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  5. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. KKM INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API