Legal Opinion

Taub v. Houston Pipeline Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided June 11, 2002No. 06-01-00073-CVPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice ROSS.

Henry J.N. Taub, H. Ben Taub, Henry J.N. Taub, II, Kitchco Realty, Ltd., Marcy Taub, and Metco Petro, Ltd. (collectively, the Taubs) appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Houston Pipeline Company and HPL Resources Company (collectively, HPL). Enron Oil <& Gas Company was an additional defendant, but the Taubs settled with Enron before this appeal.

Background

This case, concerns a 254-acre tract of land in northern Harris County overlaying the Bammel Field, a natural gas field discovered in the 1930s. The Taubs owned the surface rights. By the 1960s,…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Sport Supply Group, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Glover v. Union Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  3. ExxonMobil Corp. v. Lazy R Ranch, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Vial v. Gas Solutions, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  5. Collins v. Guinn, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API