Sebring v. Fitzgerald
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
There is no evidence in this case to justify the court in concluding that the defendants have any interest in the driveway in question, either by conveyance or use.
There is no construction thafc could be given the conveyances that would carry the defendants’ title east so as to include the driveway or any part of it. There are no official surveys or maps of the laying out of Exchange or Jay streets, the two streets involved, which would give any official data to go by. The controversy must be determined from the descriptions in the deeds and the use that has been made of the driveway in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hinkley v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Cutting v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Sewall v. GibbonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pirman v. ConferNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Berke v. LangNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Norwick v. EdelmanNew York Supreme Court · 1953
- City of New York v. Continental Vitamin Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- First Baptist Church v. LetsonNew York Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.