Legal Opinion
Pirman v. Confer
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 16, 1937PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRippey, J.
Both parties appeal to this court, each from a portion of a judgment of the Appellate Division, third department, which reversed in part and affirmed in part a judgment of the Supreme Court for Warren county. The Appellate Division set aside findings of fact made by the trial court and made new findings. It is the duty of this court to review fhe facts found by the courts below (York Mortgage Corp. v. Clotar Construction Corp., 254 N. Y. 128), and to determine where the weight of the evidence lies (McKee v. McKee, 267 N. Y. 96, 100).
The parties here are the same as those in Confer v. Pirman…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- York Mortgage Corp. v. Clotar Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Speir v. . Town of New UtrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Wiseman v. . LucksingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Hammond v. . ZehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Reid v. GarnettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Becker v. MurtaghNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Coup. v. BarthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Plaza v. FlakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Beutler v. MaynardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.