Legal Opinion

Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 27, 1984No. Nos. 83-1047, 83-1079PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SEITZ, Circuit Judge.

I

The plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court partially granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict which eliminated the largest element of the jury’s damage award in an antitrust action. The defendants, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation and Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Sales, Inc. (collectively “Kaiser”) cross-appeal from a judgment entered after a special jury verdict finding them in violation of the antitrust laws. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1982).

II. Background

The plaintiffs were the sole stockholders…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. v. John Labatt, Ltd. John Labatt, Inc. Tuscan Dairy Farms, Inc. Johanna Dairies Incorporated Robert Facchina Abc Companies, 1 Through X (Fictitious Names of Labatt Affiliates That Actively Participated in the Monopolistic Practices Described Below, but Whose Identities Are Presently Unknown) John Does, 1 Through X (Fictitious Names of Officers And/or Directors of the Corporate Who Actively Participated in the Decision-Making Regarding the Monopolistic Practices Described Below, but Whose Identities Are Presently Unknown) Elmhurst Milk & Cream Company, Inc. Local 584, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Afl-Cio Honeywell Farms, Inc., T/a Elmhurst Dairy. Tuscan Dairy Farms, Inc., Defendant/third-Party v. Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. Gilbert Levine Mark Greenberg, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re Lower Lake Erie Iron Ore Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 587). (Nineteen Cases). Wills Trucking, Inc. Consolidated Dock and Storage, Inc. Toledo World Terminal, Inc. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad, Inc. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Csx Corporation Consolidated Rail Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company (d.c. Civil No. 84-02010). Wills Trucking, Inc. And Toledo World Terminal, Inc., in 91-1526. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1586. Wills Trucking, Inc. Consolidated Dock and Storage, Inc. Toledo World Terminal, Inc. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad, Inc. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Csx Corporation Consolidated Rail Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company (d.c. Civil No. 84-02010). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1587. C.D. Ambrosia Trucking Co., Inc. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Csx Corporation, Inc. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation the Penn Central Corporation, Inc. (d.c. Civil No. 84-02012). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1588. Republic Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Consolidated Rail Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Norfolk & Western Railway Company and the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company (d.c. Civil No. 84-02079). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1589. National Steel Corporation v. Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (Civil No. 84-02134). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1590. Jones & Laughlin Steel Incorporated v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company Norfolk & Southern Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-02135). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1591. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company Norfolk & Southern Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-02138). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1592. Tauro Brothers Trucking Co. v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad, Inc. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation and Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Inc. v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Co. (d.c. Civil No. 84-02781). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1593. Sharon Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-05562). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1594. Erie Western Pennsylvania Port Authority and Codan Corporation v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Csx Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Inc. And the Penn Central Corporation, Inc. (d.c. Civil No. 84-05760). Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, in 91-1595. C.D. Ambrosia Trucking Co., Inc. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Csx Corporation, Inc. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation the Penn Central Corporation, Inc. (d.c. Civil No. 84-02012). C.D. Ambrosia Trucking Company ("Ambrosia"), in 91-1627. Republic Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Consolidated Rail Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Norfolk & Western Railway Company and the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company (d.c. Civil No. 84-02079). Republic Steel Corporation in 91-1628. National Steel Corporation v. Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-02134). National Steel Corporation, in 91-1629. Jones & Laughlin Steel Incorporated v. The Penn Central Corporation, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company Norfolk & Southern Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-02135). Jones & Laughlin Steel Incorporated, in 91-1630. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Norfolk & Western Railway Company Norfolk & Southern Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-02138). Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation, in 91-1631. Tauro Brothers Trucking Co. v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad, Inc. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation and Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Inc. v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Co. (d.c. Civil No. 84-02781). Tauro Brothers Trucking Company, in 91-1632. Sharon Steel Corporation v. The Penn Central Corporation the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company Csx Corporation Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Consolidated Rail Corporation (d.c. Civil No. 84-05562). Sharon Steel Corporation, in No. 91-1633. Erie Western Pennsylvania Port Authority and Codan Corporation v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, Inc. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Inc. Csx Corporation, Inc. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Inc. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Inc. And the Penn Central Corporation, Inc. (d.c. Civil No. 84-05760). Erie-Western Pennsylvania Port Authority and Codan Corporation ("Erie"), in 91-1634Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Meriwether v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API