Legal Opinion · Dissent
Sandgren v. West
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1941No. 28141Published
1DissentSteinert, J.
(dissenting) — As indicated in the majority opinion, that portion of the complaint which is material to the present controversy reads as follows:
“That Harry T. West and Hazel West [defendants] are now, and at all times herein mentioned have been, husband and wife and as such constitute a marital community under the laws of the State of Washington, and are the owners of a certain Buick automobile as their community property, which said automobile was being used during all times herein mentioned by the said defendants, for and on behalf of the marital community composed of them, and for their…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. First National Bank v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Anderson v. BurgoyneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Isaacs v. HollandWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Perren Ex Rel. Perren v. PressWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Bjorklund v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.