Isaacs v. Holland
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*55The opinion, of the court was delivered by
Scott, J. —
Respondents brought suit to recover two months’ rent, amounting to $1,000, which they claimed to be due them from appellants, the defendants below, by virtue of a certain lease of a lot and building thereon, in the city of Tacoma. The lease was executed in due form on the 6th day of July, 1889, to take effect on the first day of September following, and to continue for the period of five years. The defendants went into possession of the premises thereunder and continued to hold the same, and paid the stipulated rent therefor, •$500.00 per…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The People Ex Rel. Crane v. . RyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Enyeart v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Hoover v. Chambers, Washington Territory1887
- Slattery v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by22 opinions
- Richards v. RedelsheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Harris v. HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Ankeny v. Pomeroy Grain Growers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Spreitzer v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Stabbert v. Atlas Imperial Diesel Engine Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.