Legal Opinion

Moran, Shuster, Carignan & Knierim v. August

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 2, 1995No. 15116PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Moran, Shuster, Carignan and Knierim, is a general partnership engaged in the practice of law with its principal office located in Avon. The plaintiff is the successor to the firm of August, Moran, Lazorick and Shuster. The defendant, Robert B. August, was a partner in the plaintiff until March 20, 1991, when he withdrew from the partnership. Pursuant to a written partnership agreement, each partner in the firm had a capital account that he was obligated to maintain in the amount of $10,000. As of the date of the defendant’s withdrawal from the firm, his capital account had a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Van Dyck Printing Co. v. DiNicolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Advanced Business Systems, Inc. v. CrystalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Moran, Shuster, Carignan & Knierim v. AugustConnecticut Superior Court · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. August v. MoranConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. Gianetti v. Donahue, No. 319218 (Sep. 27, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  3. August v. Moran, No. Cv-0538682 (Mar. 24, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  4. Gianetti v. Donahue, No. 319218 (Sep. 27, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  5. Ziegler v. Segal Laska, LLC, No. Cv 01-0506441s (Dec. 12, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API