Legal Opinion

Moran, Shuster, Carignan & Knierim v. August

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided May 2, 1994No. File 456076SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hon. Leonard W. Dorsey, State Trial Referee.

This is a case tried to the court. The plaintiff, Moran, Shuster, Carignan and Knierim (firm), is a general partnership engaged in the practice of law. The firm is the successor in interest to August, Moran, Lazorick and Shuster and until March 20,1991, the firm was known by that name.

Robert B. August is the defendant. Until March 20, 1991, the defendant practiced law as a general partner with the firm and with the firm’s predecessor in interest. On March 20, 1991, the defendant withdrew from the partnership.

The defendant had entered into a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Daddona v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. CBS Surgical Group, Inc. v. HoltConnecticut Superior Court · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moran, Shuster, Carignan & Knierim v. AugustSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Gianetti v. Donahue, No. 319218 (Sep. 27, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  3. Cassidento v. Mathis, No. Cv.-94-0537124 (Jan. 24, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  4. Gianetti v. Donahue, No. 319218 (Sep. 27, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  5. Ziegler v. Segal Laska, LLC, No. Cv 01-0506441s (Dec. 12, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API