Legal Opinion
Danvers Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 19, 2005No. 04-3950PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALITO, Circuit Judge.
Eight automobile dealers appeal the District Court’s dismissal of their claims against the Ford Motor Company for lack of standing. Because their complaint alleges concrete and particularized injuries that are fairly traceable to Ford’s behavior and redressable in court, we reverse and remand.
I
In November 2000, a putative nationwide class of Ford dealers brought suit, claiming that Ford’s recently introduced Blue Oval Program (“BOP”) violated state and federal law. A District Court dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of standing. Danvers Motor Co. v. Ford Motor…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Blunt v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Krim M. Ballentine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Winer Family Trust v. QueenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Toll Bros., Inc. v. Township of ReadingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.